Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
May 18, 2011
Image Size
9.3 KB
Resolution
116×68
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,077
Favourites
54 (who?)
Comments
216
Downloads
12
×
Can't Fear What I Don't Fear by SionnaDehr Can't Fear What I Don't Fear by SionnaDehr
Because somehow, disagreeing equals bigoted, intolerant, and insensitive and afraid. Yet, no one simply allows people to disagree. No prejudice involved, there are just some things that people are going to disagree with when it comes to homosexuality.
Oh, and apparently, the above also means that people who disagree with the idea of homosexuality hate all homosexuals. Yeah, no, sorry kids. Assuming things just makes an ass out of yourselves.
Now, if people do kill or assault or do something inexplicably horrible to homosexuals, now that would be the point where many people like me say something along the lines of "that intolerant bastard". Trust me, the disagreers hate the people that hurt people for who they are just as much as everyone else.

Disclaimer: This is simply my opinion. No offense is intended with this stamp. This is simply something that needs to be said since people are so touchy.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconwadanobara:
wadanobara Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
HETEROPHOBIC. Because apparently you just cant disagree anymore.
Reply
:iconll-vitiatus-ll:
ll-vitiatus-ll Featured By Owner Edited Oct 14, 2014  Student Digital Artist
:iconthumbsupplz: bless
Reply
:iconmadoke:
madoke Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
wha t the hell do you "disagree" with// like seriously im confused -_-

and yea, that is the definition of homophobic lmao
Reply
:iconkittycreator:
KittyCreator Featured By Owner Jun 18, 2014  Student Digital Artist
I wonder why people care about who is in a relationship with the same sex or not. And not care about their own. :facepalm:
Reply
:iconamanda2324:
amanda2324 Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
To OctopusCharade, who cowardly blocked me before I could respond:

"holy shit you are the most homophobic, sexist, person ive seen in a long time."

Guess what? I don't care about your mere opinion.

"All right, fine, rights are extended to individuals. So, you're saying that an individual old person, and infertile person have the right to marry. However, an individual man or woman does NOT have that right simply because they're gay?"

False. A homosexual man can marry any consenting unrelated adult woman. So, yes, he does have the right to marry an individual of the opposite-sex. Same as everyone else.

"That's even worse that my former point because you ARE being down right homophobic in that instance to a great degree. You're not against the couple so much as you are against the individual who happens to be gay.  Dancing around your homophobic point in an attempt to seem worldly and fair by saying NOBODY has the right to marry someone of the same gender is asinine and just repulsive. What you are saying is homosexuals can't get married to the people they love. Full stop. You're trying to flower it with seemingly intellectual text, but its filibustering and a down right disgusting attempt to hide your own bigotry and hostility. You're trying to mask your hate speech, but guess what? It's still hate speech."

Your argument: My argument is homophobic.
My response: I don't care if it's homophobic.

And no, I am not against the individual. False assumption. Everything else appears to be a childish rant.

"Furthermore, homosexual relationships are not demeaning other relationships. To even infer that is disgusting."

Prove that I inferred such a thing.

"One's personal preference in their romantic choices do not extend to ruling out the opposite of such entirely. It's like saying if someone really liked blue eyes on their partner, regardless of orientation and sex, they're ruling out every human being with a different eye color implying that they aren't needed. Are you really saying that? Are you really that much of an idiot? JFC you really are the biggest idiot I've talked to in a long while."

You have committed a false analogy fallacy. Excluding a person of a specific sex from a particular union is different from excluding persons of different eye colors. Why? Because the variety of hair colors, eye colors, skin colors/races, first of all, exceeds the limit of how many people are allowed into a single marriage contract. It's also different because eye color, race, etc., do not effect one's behavior, physiology, and a host of other things. Men and women are drastically different, even if they are the same race, have the same eye and hair colors, etc. These differences are important, and men and women are equally required in society. People of any particular eye color are not needed, because it doesn't matter what a person's eye color is.

"Furthermore, Taking what you said, are you implying that single mothers, people who don't wish to have life long relationships, and single fathers are omitting the opposite gender?"

False. Currently, they aren't even looking. Not looking, and specifically making an attempt to exclude persons of a specific sex from their union are two completely different things.

"Because the world opinion on saying that would be to be appalled. So, if you aren't saying that you're a hypocrite who is once again trying to mask your deep rooted homophobia in fancy wordings in an attempt to seem like an intellectual. If you are saying that I'm sure the general consensus, even amongst your fellow homophobes, would be to be appalled with the disgusting notion."

I don't see an argument here. Just a lot of babbling.

"That entire analogy is flawed, offensive, sexist, homophobic and minimizing the issue so you can pretend you aren't hurting people with your misguided opinion. Love and life are not a fucking game. To compare it to one is wrong. Regardless of sex, gender, and sexuality. To think it's not really makes you an ignorant slob."

Explain why it is flawed. I don't care if it's offensive, sexist, or homophobic. Explain why it so called "minimizes the issue." Also prove to me that my motive is to "pretend that I don't hurt people." Also please provide proof and evidence that my opinion is misguided. Do explain to me where I said Love and life are a game. Seems you don't understand how analogies within the context of a debate works.

And I don't care about your opinion of me, so I couldn't care less if your mere opinion of me is that I'm an "ignorant slob."

"Tbh you're a homophobic, sexist piece of ignorant trash and you REALLY need to reevaluate your life is you can turn serious life issues into a sport or game. Also, if you're really so seated in your fucked up opinions maybe you should speak to yourself instead of copy pasting from OTHER peoples fucked up opinions. YOU FEEL SO STRONGLY BUT CANT EVEN FIGHT FOR YOURSELF. "

Yawn. It's funny you think anyone would re-evaluate themselves based on what you say. Don't flatter yourself. Your conduct is horrible, your debating skills lack proper use of the tools of logic and critical thinking, and your overuse of specific words and insults make you look like an idiot. How is anyone supposed to take you seriously? Maybe if you used "sexist" or "homophobic" a few more times? Probably not.

"lmao get fucked"

Thank you for being such a terrible example of the LGBT and Allies community. I'm sure they'll appreciate you showing to everyone who already dislikes the LGBT and Allies community, or those who don't have an opinion, that LGBT people and their straight allies are very poor-behaved individuals.
Reply
:iconzarhx:
zarhx Featured By Owner Jun 26, 2013
The thing is, it's not a matter of "disagreeing." It's a matter of people voting to make their opinions LAW. Opinions on matters that affect you in zero ways.

Please, please, please. Give me a good reason against gays marrying. Something that outweighs the pros.
Reply
:iconendler:
endler Featured By Owner Jun 21, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
If you're just not a fan and you end it at there, then I can't say you are one. I honestly don't care if someone doesn't support gay marriage or anything as long as they don't go harassing people/go out of their way to try to stop it from happening. :meow:
Reply
:iconbuzzy-queen-bee:
Buzzy-Queen-Bee Featured By Owner May 25, 2013
BUT I WANT TO MARRY A BEAUTIFUL GIRL NOT AN UGLY BOY
Reply
:iconacruxic:
Acruxic Featured By Owner May 7, 2013  Student Filmographer
If your a christian, you would get the most hate.. If you say you don't agree with the life style.
Reply
:iconsionnadehr:
SionnaDehr Featured By Owner May 7, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
Why? I just say I don't agree. I'm not infringing on anyone's rights. I'm not telling anyone that they're horrible people (which I do not believe). I'm definitely not saying that I hate anyone for what they choose to identify themselves as.
I'm just saying that my religious convictions do not allow me to agree. If that bothers you, then ignore me.
Reply
:iconacruxic:
Acruxic Featured By Owner May 7, 2013  Student Filmographer
You seem not to understand what I said.. ^^;
matter of fact I agree with what you think I am saying in general which is a true fact..
If your a christian you'll get the most hate for having a different opinion

true story.
Reply
:iconsionnadehr:
SionnaDehr Featured By Owner May 7, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
Ah, I see. Sorry for misunderstanding.
You're right. We do tend to get a lot of flack for having a different opinion. Granted, I can't say all of that is unfounded since our faith has this one small, and very loud, minority of Christians spewing hatred towards everyone to the sun.I doubt that helps.
Reply
:iconacruxic:
Acruxic Featured By Owner May 7, 2013  Student Filmographer
It's ok.
And yeah. But not to worry about it any more.. I give up because one day there will be judgement day where God will come.
Reply
:iconsoulsilverheartgold:
SoulSilverHeartGold Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2013  Student Digital Artist
I think one of the biggest problems with a lot of the arguments surrounding this topic is that people seem to believe that having same-sex attractions automatically translates into desiring a same-sex partner. I've read tons of blogs of religious people who have same-sex attractions and really DON'T want to get involved in same-sex sexual behavior. Attraction doesn't always equal desire to act on it. Humans are capable of self control, and nothing can take that away.

I also understand that there are those who expirience same-sex attractions that choose to act on them. While I disagree with that decision, I do not think it is a sin simply for them to expirience those attractions (being attracted to someone of the same sex isn't really something you can control - how you choose to react to it, however, is.) and I am heavily against bullying/harrassing/discrimination based on attractions or actions, (unless said actions include illegal/dangerou behavior) because no matter what they believe or do, they are still human beings with rights.

Just my thoughts.
Reply
:iconjamesruglia:
Jamesruglia Featured By Owner Feb 14, 2013
As soon as the word "homophobic" appears in a conversation or speech, the source loses all credibility.
Reply
:icontohokari-steel:
Tohokari-Steel Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
"Homophobic", like "racist", probably meant something serious, but due to it being twisted from its original meaning, now means nothing.
Reply
:iconvivaamerica:
VivaAmerica Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2013
That avatar plus your intelligent response has me wondering if you're the real Question... :iconsuspiciousplz:
Reply
:icontohokari-steel:
Tohokari-Steel Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2013

The plastic tips on the ends of shoelaces are called "aglets". Their true purpose is sinister...

Seriously, thanks for that.

Reply
:iconvivaamerica:
VivaAmerica Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2013
No problem, send Batman my regards.
Reply
:icontohokari-steel:
Tohokari-Steel Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2013
I will. Just remember: there WAS a magic bullet, forged by Illuminati mystics to prevent us from learning THE TRUTH.
Reply
:iconsiogaagusarrachtaigh:
SiogaAgusArrachtaigh Featured By Owner Jul 1, 2012
People these days don't seem to understand that 'hate' and 'disagreement' are not interchangeable terms.
Reply
:iconxxcorn-flakexx:
XxCorn-FlakeXx Featured By Owner May 20, 2012  Student Photographer
SO TRUE.
If I say, " I don't agree with the homosexual life style" people automatically label me as a homophobic
pisses me off.
Reply
:icontillshilohcomes:
TillShilohComes Featured By Owner May 17, 2012
I reckon this stamp has proved your point. So have all the irrational flamers here.
Reply
:iconjathara:
Jathara Featured By Owner Apr 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Disagreeing with a basic tenant of human rights and telling people they don't have the RIGHT to love is bigoted, intolerant, and insensitive. It may or may not a fear.

Disagree isn't even a word. That's like saying "I disagree with black people" or "I disagree with white people." No. You "are intolerant of black/white people." Same thing with homophobia.
Reply
:iconerintheeevee:
ErinTheEevee Featured By Owner Oct 23, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
:iconbutthurtplz:
Reply
:iconxxcorn-flakexx:
XxCorn-FlakeXx Featured By Owner May 20, 2012  Student Photographer
no it means you disagree with the life style of being gay
Reply
:iconoctopuscharade:
OctopusCharade Featured By Owner Sep 29, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
What does "life style" even mean? I'm gay. I live my life like any other person would. Exactly as my straight friends do. What does "life style of being gay" even mean? Having sexual relationships with someone of the same gender? If so, welcome to the world of being a bigot.
Reply
:iconjathara:
Jathara Featured By Owner May 20, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Homophobia, is, by definition: "irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals." There you go, out of the dictionary.

Fair warning: you're going to get to see a little bet of my crazy here. Nothing much, but the romantic and sexual obsession of our culture is revolting to me. Calling homosexuality a lifestyle is degrading to humanity just like calling any sexuality a lifestyle is. Humanity is better than basing our lives around attraction. It implies that life is about sex, about the romantic, when the platonic is so much more important in our culture. To me my right to love is very important, but I'm just as reliant on my friendships. I do not live a "homosexual" lifestyle; if anything I live an asexual lifestyle because as of current I do not feel I have the time nor the resources to maintain a romantic relationship and I'd like to focus on more important aspects of my life. Do you live a heterosexual lifestyle? To make heterosexuality a lifestyle, you'd need to advertise it everywhere, engage in a lot of sexual intercourse, and base your entire life off your attraction to the opposite sex. And that would simply be ridiculous.

I'm not entirely certain what your reasons for being intolerant of homosexual relationships are, and I'd be curious to hear, because I can hardly debate things when I don't know what I'm debating! Because yes, being against homosexuality is intolerant, and hateful, and insensitive. You may not hate the person, but you are against a core aspect of who they are which is an integral and natural part of them. It's like being racist - racist people frequently have black friends. The fact that they are black is not hugely important, but it is also a core aspect of them - you can't oppress them for it.
Reply
:iconxxcorn-flakexx:
XxCorn-FlakeXx Featured By Owner May 21, 2012  Student Photographer
Well people call being a homosexual a life style ok
Reply
:iconsayuri1314:
Sayuri1314 Featured By Owner Sep 20, 2011  Student Digital Artist
How can you disagree with homosexuality? It's like disagreeing with the grass being green or the sun going down at nightfall.
"Night, I disagree with you!" I guess you could do that, but it is kinda wierd...
Reply
:icondevilslittleangel777:
... This made me LOL. Because for the people I know, it's not true xD People can be really dumb sometimes xD
Reply
:iconscarecrowmarionette:
ScarecrowMarionette Featured By Owner Jun 12, 2011
What is there to disagree with?
Nothing.
You fit the definition.
:icondealwithitdogplz:
Reply
:iconscarecrowmarionette:
ScarecrowMarionette Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2011
Well, seeing as neither of you two could come up with a compelling argument, I guess I win. :)
Reply
:iconmymagic1212:
Mymagic1212 Featured By Owner Feb 13, 2013  Student Traditional Artist
I haven';t heard the "I win" argument ending in years from my sister, that's the most annoying, childish, ignorant way to end any kind of discussion, you might as well of "thrown the game" as soon as you said that.
Reply
:iconsionnadehr:
SionnaDehr Featured By Owner Jun 12, 2011  Hobbyist Writer
Of course, I run and hide at the very mention of the words "gay" or "lesbian". -_-
Reply
:iconscarecrowmarionette:
ScarecrowMarionette Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2011
"Irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals"
Irrational discrimination against homosexuals. Thanks Merriam-Webster Dictionary. :)
Why don't you attack it for having Homo in it too, the genus that we fall under? :rofl:
Reply
:iconsiogaagusarrachtaigh:
Why don't you find a better dictionary? The original definition for homophobe is an irrational fear of homosexuals. Prejudice against gays by straights is called heterosexism. Two entirely different things.
Reply
:iconscarecrowmarionette:
ScarecrowMarionette Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2011
"Using the term heterosexism highlights the parallels between antigay sentiment and other forms of prejudice, such as racism, antisemitism, and sexism.”
—Gregory M. Herek
Cool to know your a bitch like a racist, bro.
I don't know why you can't just stick to being labelled as having just negative attitudes, and demand being labelled the same level as a racist. :) All homophobia implies is antipathy, contempt, and/or fear. Just ask a Coulrophobia if (s)he has antipathy, contempt, and/or fear of clowns and they'll say yes to the three.
Reply
:iconsiogaagusarrachtaigh:
Cool to know that your a rude little shit-stain who likes to pull assumptions out of their ass. :|

Seeing as I'm not a homophobe or a heterosexist, since as I neither fear nor or hate gays. But that doesn't mean I don't support those who are. If someone doesn't like a person because they are gay, then that person has the right to do so. Saying they're the same as racists isn't going to change their minds, and it certainly doesn't make you look any better.

Pfft. Please. I'm sedatephobic, but I don't feel any contempt or antipathy to silence. I'm just afraid of it.
Reply
:iconscarecrowmarionette:
ScarecrowMarionette Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2011
You mean assumptions that are based on what's given to me, then sure, I'm an ass. :)

It isn't meant to change their minds. Its meant to show that their prejudice should not be tolerated just as racism. It's to appeal to the mass society and stigmatize them. In no way is any group treated the exact same, but it's to draw a correlation. See in the quote I found it says "highlights the parallels"? It doesn't say "Perfectly aligned". It's purely to attach a stigma to the people, who have no grounds for their bad attitude towards somebody elses sex life. I recall a quote about civil rights "You never win, you just do a little better each time". Perhaps one day those ideas will die, and being gay will be no different than being straight in society. Being black in todays society is still getting you problems; even being jewish.

My doubts are high that you wouldn't favourite this stamp if it said "White Supremacy/Racist: because you can't just disagree any more".

Silence is not a person, group, minority or object. It's a lack of sound waves. Stranger still, if made into a verb, it means those who are oppressed. (See sentences like "He was silenced.") Like homosexuals by people such as the stamp maker and yourself (since you favourited it, it's a fair assumption) who "disagree" with it. Who "disagree" with same-sex marriage. "Disagree" with same-sex couples. "Disagree" with same-sex sex. Draw a line. When does your "disagreement" become homophobia and/or heterosexism? A prejudice?
Reply
:iconsiogaagusarrachtaigh:
Except that the only thing that was given to you was the fact that I think you're a retard who doesn't know how to use proper definitions. :|

Except that nobody has to like a minority, nor do they have to have a reason as to why they don't like that minority.People have every right to be as intolerant as they damn well please, and calling people out on someone for their views makes you look just as intolerant. Tolerance is bullshit anyways.

White supremacy, no. Racist, it's still their opinion and still their right to feel that way.

No shit? You were talking about phobias in general. You never stated that it HAD to be a person or an object, and either way, it's still a phobia.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconmoonwarriorautumn:
MoonWarriorAutumn Featured By Owner May 19, 2011
I may not agree with homosexuality, but that doesn't mean I can't love that person just the same and be their friend. And they deserve to be treated with respect and not be bullied. They're human beings like the rest of us.
Reply
:iconspesiria:
Spesiria Featured By Owner May 19, 2011
But what is there to "disagree" with? Isn't disagreeing with homosexuality equally silly as disagreeing with heterosexuality? It's a sexuality, not an opinion.
Reply
:iconamanda2324:
amanda2324 Featured By Owner May 24, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Guy + Gal = baby. Heterosexuality is essential to survival of the human race, and any of the animal races, too. Homosexuality is not required for anything.
Reply
:iconriza-izumi:
Riza-Izumi Featured By Owner Jun 24, 2011
:roll: yea, because everyone needs a child.

Having a child =/= True Love. Love = the most important thing in a relationship.
Reply
:iconamanda2324:
amanda2324 Featured By Owner Jun 24, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Well, love doesn't need marriage to be love, now does it?

Your rebuttal is flawed and lacks coherent details.
Reply
:iconoctopuscharade:
OctopusCharade Featured By Owner Sep 29, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Infertile couples have the right to get married. Older individuals who can't reproduce have the right to get married. People with absolutely no desire to reproduce have the right to get married.

But same gendered couples don't have that right simply on the grounds they're the same gender. They have absolutely everything in common with opposite gendered couples that are infertile, old, or will simply chose to never have children EXCEPT for the fact they're of the same gender.

To infer that you aren't disagreeing with  the idea of a same gendered marriage simply because of your own bigotry and bias is baseless in and of itself. 
Reply
:iconamanda2324:
amanda2324 Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
"Infertile couples have the right to get married. Older individuals who can't reproduce have the right to get married. People with absolutely no desire to reproduce have the right to get married."

1. Yes, a medical problem does not disqualify a person from being able to exercise their rights.
2. Old age - something that everyone will reach, assuming nothing kills them before that - does not disqualify someone from exercising their rights.
3. Motive is impossible to determine or measure, and more often than not, the couple changes their mind later.

"But same gendered couples don't have that right simply on the grounds they're the same gender."

Your statement is flawed. Rights are not extended to couples, but individuals. No individual has the right to marry someone of the same sex, regardless of their own personal sexual orientation.

"They have absolutely everything in common with opposite gendered couples that are infertile, old, or will simply chose to never have children EXCEPT for the fact they're of the same gender."

False. Same-sex couples omit one of the sexes from their make-up, which implies that persons of the sex that has been omitted are unneeded, replaceable, or second rate. This is a negative message to send to children, and a negative message that society should not support. Same-sex couples are also not equal to opposite-sex couples because fathers cannot be mothers, and mothers cannot be fathers.

An analogy to better explain:

You have a baseball team. Baseball teams require equipment, at least gloves, bats, and a ball. The also require outfielders and in-fielders. An opposite-sex couple is like a normal baseball team. They have all of the required equipment and all of the required team members. They occasionally win games.

Infertile couples are exactly like the team above, except they always lose. Some of their team members may have physical abnormalities or impairments, but that doesn't stop them from trying.

Elderly couples are the baseball team consisting of older members exclusively. They also never win games.

Same-sex couples are a baseball team with either bats or gloves, but never both, infielders or outfielders, but never both. They can never win a game, and they're really not a baseball team. But they continue to insist that they are, and throw a fit when the umpire informs them that they cannot play, because they refuse to follow the exact same rules as everyone else and do not have the required equipment and team players.

"To infer that you aren't disagreeing with  the idea of a same gendered marriage simply because of your own bigotry and bias is baseless in and of itself."

I don't understand your statement. But for the record, bigotry is a meaningless word to me. It seems to be a word that people throw around when they're upset and wish to avoid intellectual dialogue.

Links:

www.mercatornet.com/articles/v…
Reply
:iconamanda2324:
amanda2324 Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Just as a note to anybody who reads these comments and notice that I didn't reply to "OctopusCharade." It's because they spend most of their time using insults or hyperbole to make statements, or they don't even address anything I stated.

They are also being a very poor, pathetic example of the LGBT community. I often get very ticked off at the LGBT community because I come across way too many of the bad apples. So when I come across one that purposefully tries to make the LGBT community look bad, I have chosen to try to ignore them. When OctopusCharade can choose a more appropriate, adult like behavior in their conduct, then I may begin the conversation with them again.

Until then, it's a waste of time and energy.

Note: If any /good/, /nice/, and /proper/ LGBT community (and allies) members want to just drop by and say hi, feel free. I need to see more of you around, 'cause I like you guys, and those bad apples are dang annoying.
Reply
:iconoctopuscharade:
OctopusCharade Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
holy shit you are the most homophobic, sexist, person ive seen in a long time. All right, fine, rights are extended to individuals. So, you're saying that an individual old person, and infertile person have the right to marry. However, an individual man or woman does NOT have that right simply because they're gay?

That's even worse that my former point because you ARE being down right homophobic in that instance to a great degree. You're not against the couple so much as you are against the individual who happens to be gay.  Dancing around your homophobic point in an attempt to seem worldly and fair by saying NOBODY has the right to marry someone of the same gender is asinine and just repulsive. What you are saying is homosexuals can't get married to the people they love. Full stop. You're trying to flower it with seemingly intellectual text, but its filibustering and a down right disgusting attempt to hide your own bigotry and hostility. You're trying to mask your hate speech, but guess what? It's still hate speech. 

Furthermore, homosexual relationships are not demeaning other relationships. To even infer that is disgusting. One's personal preference in their romantic choices do not extend to ruling out the opposite of such entirely. It's like saying if someone really liked blue eyes on their partner, regardless of orientation and sex, they're ruling out every human being with a different eye color implying that they aren't needed. Are you really saying that? Are you really that much of an idiot? JFC you really are the biggest idiot I've talked to in a long while.

Furthermore, Taking what you said, are you implying that single mothers, people who don't wish to have life long relationships, and single fathers are omitting the opposite gender? Because the world opinion on saying that would be to be appalled. So, if you aren't saying that you're a hypocrite who is once again trying to mask your deep rooted homophobia in fancy wordings in an attempt to seem like an intellectual. If you are saying that I'm sure the general consensus, even amongst your fellow homophobes, would be to be appalled with the disgusting notion.

That entire analogy is flawed, offensive, sexist, homophobic and minimizing the issue so you can pretend you aren't hurting people with your misguided opinion. Love and life are not a fucking game. To compare it to one is wrong. Regardless of sex, gender, and sexuality. To think it's not really makes you an ignorant slob.

Tbh you're a homophobic, sexist piece of ignorant trash and you REALLY need to reevaluate your life is you can turn serious life issues into a sport or game. Also, if you're really so seated in your fucked up opinions maybe you should speak to yourself instead of copy pasting from OTHER peoples fucked up opinions. YOU FEEL SO STRONGLY BUT CANT EVEN FIGHT FOR YOURSELF. 

lmao get fucked 
Reply
Add a Comment: